A lovely coffee with my old advisor. Now everyone knows I’m a semanticist wannabe. (Stress on wannabe. Of course now that I’ve told everyone I’ll change my mind. Oh well.)
Background:
At Canada U, there wasn’t much semantics. Oh, there was one person who was, supposedly, a semanticist, but he’s really a failed mathematician. Also hasn’t published in years, as far as I can tell. I complained about him and his course regularly. To this advisor also. Indiscreet? Yeah.
The problem with the “semantics” at Canada U is that it isn’t. Oh, we covered all the general things. Predicate logic, and translating English into it. (Also covered in the prerequisite courses intro to logic, but whatever.) A sudden switch to using restrictors — except we never discussed why you might want to. (A: because predicate logic is not so good with things like “most”.) A mention of donkey anaphora (”Every farmer who owns a donkey beats it”) but no real discussion about it, other than it exists. Well, okay. Why do we care?
I know *now* why we care, but that’s because I have since had capable semanticists teaching me real semantics. Which was primarily the same thing, except that it was related to language. As a linguist, I like that.
So over coffee, I say that I’ve been back for so long because the only class I had that might not have been cancelled was syntax, and I wasn’t sticking around just for syntax. I said I was becoming a semanticist.
At Canada U I was a syntactician: though I wanted to want to be a phonologist, it never took. And I complained (see above) about semantics all the time. (I can’t imagine that any of this was news to anyone there. There have been fights since he got tenure about how he teaches semantics. Maybe longer.) So my advisor asks me if I had had any inkling of that.
“Well, in the intro course, semantics was my favourite section.” (Followed closely, I think, by morphology. Which is why I rather like the take-every-morpheme-into-account-as-it-goes school of semantics. Morphosemantics is cool. I guess that’s sort of what I’m doing in my paper. Anyhow.) And she laughed and said “But not after.”
No. But it is now. It’s what I want to work on, but don’t dare, because my learnability paper is due Wed. Actually, I’m good for that deadline, so I will let myself work on semantics now. I’m either a nerd or I have no life; I can’t quite decide which.