Comments on: Things with things in it.

By: Cougar

Cougar — Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:24:09 +0000

Reminds me of a Pogo cartoon: Churchy La Femme reads a box and exclaims, “I can’t eat this — it’s all full of ingrediments!” (sic)

Churchy wasn’t complaining about chocolate chips, though.

By: profgrrrrl

profgrrrrl — Sun, 28 Nov 2004 19:54:18 +0000

I may be making more scones in the near future (when I get home). Will share the recipes for sure.

By: Rudbeckia Hirta

Rudbeckia Hirta — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:51:25 +0000

I’ve been reluctant to admit it, but I’d much prefer my chocolate chip cookies without the chocolate chips.

But I do very much love those pepperidge farm cookies with the white chocolate + macadamias (Tahoe? I think?). So it’s just a bias against normal chocolate chips.

By: wolfangel

wolfangel — Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:15:03 +0000

Oh, good, I look forward to the recipes.

I like raw cookie dough without the chocolate chips. But not cooked: that needs chocolate. But the chips need to be good and not cheap storebrand chocolate. My mother just doesn’t like food with things in it — nothing with nuts, no chocolate chips in anything (including ice cream), etc.

By: profgrrrrl

profgrrrrl — Tue, 30 Nov 2004 05:27:31 +0000

I used cinnamon chips in cookies last week. I bet they would be good in scones (like the Starbucks cinnamon scones?) I have ginger chips I’ve been hanging onto as well, not sure what I want to do with them. Thinking maybe scones again. It might be a month for scones.

And I agree — good chocolate makes a huge difference.