a wolf angel is not a good angel

10 Comments »

1. profgrrrrl:
   January 13th, 2005 @ 11:30 pm

   hee. that was not what i was thinking re: sheepskin thong!

2. cindy:
   January 14th, 2005 @ 1:23 am

   Me neither! And I was disappointed :-(

3. brina:
   January 14th, 2005 @ 9:55 am

   heh, that is strange. but I’m relieved to see it’s a shoe because the alternative is just too nasty ;)

4. jo(e):
   January 14th, 2005 @ 10:38 am

   I too was picturing a thong to wear under pants. Since I’m allergic to wool or anything related to sheep, just the thought of it made me itch!

5. cindy:
   January 14th, 2005 @ 1:27 pm

   See, I wasn’t thinking of the discomfort or anything else. Just Jude Law wearing one. . .

6. denisdekat:
   January 14th, 2005 @ 2:52 pm

   you got me ;) I expect the other type of thong, haha :D

7. Cougar:
   January 14th, 2005 @ 3:32 pm

   I wonder … how many people search the net for “sheepskin thong” every day….

8. wolfangel:
   January 14th, 2005 @ 11:15 pm

   There is no way in which I am disappointed that this is not the other kind of thong. I will, however, say that the sheepskin underwear thong seems to make a lot more sense than the sheepskin shoe thong.

9. LiL:
   January 16th, 2005 @ 12:19 am

   I too thought it was the underwear kind. At least then it could be an odd sex toy. This way it’s just kinda ugly.

10. yekxfeucbr:
    April 8th, 2005 @ 12:37 pm

    soslqlws

    gbevea

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>