Not exactly a resemblance in my books
You can think what you like about the Vancouver 2010 Olympics logo — I happen to like it — but noticing “the remarkable resemblance it has to Pacman“?
You can think what you like about the Vancouver 2010 Olympics logo — I happen to like it — but noticing “the remarkable resemblance it has to Pacman“?
April 27th, 2005 at 1:02 pm
The head… maybe. But you have to ignore the rest of it that looks like a pile of rocks.
Is there some law that says all Olympic mascots have to look stupid?
April 27th, 2005 at 1:56 pm
Yes, Pac-man was green and squarish, and had a narrow little slit for a mouth. And was the top part of an inukshuk.
April 27th, 2005 at 3:46 pm
I still like the mascot. Though I reserve the right to start to dislike it if they ever animate it so that it’s skiing or any other winter sporting.
April 27th, 2005 at 4:22 pm
How can they not animate it? It’ll look pretty fly hitting the slopes. And a big puffy one will perform at the opening ceremonies. Again, fly.
Although I’m not to keen on it, it is better than the Atlanta monstrosity, Whizbang or Geewihz or Foshizzle. I forget what the actual name is but it was as dumb as the graphic.
April 28th, 2005 at 12:04 am
They can choose not to animate it because it’s a HUGE PILE OF ROCKS and it should not be skiing. Also, if there is an official person walking around like a big inukshuk during the Olympics I will be tempted to poke my eyes out.
I liked the stupid thing until I got these images in my head. Argh.