Jeff at Quid Nomen Illius? points me to OxBlog’s fisking of that idiotic article about law students going into debt for caffeine: it’s like heroin, only much cheaper and legal, or something.
Beyond those arguments, I was also amused by the idea that without the horrors of 3$ lattes, students wouldn’t spend any money whatsoever on anything frivolous (or coffee beans and milk and electricity at home: anyone want to estimate the cost of the same latte at home? I don’t feel like bothering, but how about some of the mathematicians in the house?).
What world do all these people who are arguing against these things live in where they don’t have any small luxuries at all? If I budget, for argument’s sake, 200$/month in random small crap, and half of it goes to coffee instead of whatever luxuries they prefer (alcohol? expensive perfume? cigarettes? extra gas and insurance for your big-ass SUV?), what does it matter? But of course, only their own small luxuries are acceptable ones: if you’re at all short on money, you should never ever have anything nice.
Update: everyone’s making fun of this! Some highlights:
What about laundry? Perhaps students, instead of wasting money on machines, could just get a washboard and do their clothes in the kitchen sink. That’d save more money. (Murphies: NB: I know lots of people who brewed their own beer in school.)
Suppose they didn’t buy the coffee and, because they were less than perfectly alert, they failed their classes. They would still owe a lot of money right? (Less whatever they spent on lattes, assuming they didn’t just substitute some other expensive habit.) Only by passing the classes they are more fit to pay off the student loans. (Antigravitas)
Because the premise, in brief, is that law students who incur debts of over $100,000 to complete their degree do not realize the true cost of their Starbucks “addiction” over this time, a habit that presumably is spiraling out of control. (Ahab’s Whale)
Lots of people agree with my contention that Starbucks does not make very good coffee, so you should go elsewhere for your fix.
Denial is proof there’s a problem: clearly, this frontpage article was *important*.