<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Less thoughtful, more addicted</title>
	<link>http://wolfangel.calltherain.net/archives/2007/10/22/less-thoughtful-more-addicted/</link>
	<description>this is a wolf angel &#038; it eats the people it's supposed to help. A wolf angel is not a good angel to have looking out for you.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 04:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Madeleine</title>
		<link>http://wolfangel.calltherain.net/archives/2007/10/22/less-thoughtful-more-addicted/#comment-194576</link>
		<author>Madeleine</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wolfangel.calltherain.net/archives/2007/10/22/less-thoughtful-more-addicted/#comment-194576</guid>
					<description>This article makes no sense to me at all. If the food was always behind the same door, why is it "addiction" to always go the correct door? I could understand that description if they moved the food around after a few days, and the mice still went to the same door first every time, but they didn't say that. Bad science writing, I suspect. Or maybe bad science?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article makes no sense to me at all. If the food was always behind the same door, why is it &#8220;addiction&#8221; to always go the correct door? I could understand that description if they moved the food around after a few days, and the mice still went to the same door first every time, but they didn&#8217;t say that. Bad science writing, I suspect. Or maybe bad science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolfa</title>
		<link>http://wolfangel.calltherain.net/archives/2007/10/22/less-thoughtful-more-addicted/#comment-194577</link>
		<author>wolfa</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 15:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wolfangel.calltherain.net/archives/2007/10/22/less-thoughtful-more-addicted/#comment-194577</guid>
					<description>Certainly bad science writing, I don't know enough to say whether or not it's also bad science. I mean, they got into the habit of going to the door where the food was? Isn't that just learning? But we couldn't have an article saying that XX mice learn faster than XY mice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly bad science writing, I don&#8217;t know enough to say whether or not it&#8217;s also bad science. I mean, they got into the habit of going to the door where the food was? Isn&#8217;t that just learning? But we couldn&#8217;t have an article saying that XX mice learn faster than XY mice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
